- About
- Message from the Chair
- History
- Facilities
- News
- Events
- Info Sci Colloquium
- Advancing Responsible AI with Human-Centered Evaluation
- Bowers Distinguished Speaker Series - Julie E. Cohen, Georgetown University Law Center
- From Agents to Optimization: User Interface Understanding and Generation
- The Language of Creation: How Generative AI Challenges Intuitions—and Offers New Possibilities
- IS Engaged
- Graduation Info
- Info Sci Colloquium
- Contact Us
- Courses
- Research
- Computational Social Science
- Critical Data Studies
- Data Science
- Economics and Information
- Education Technology
- Ethics, Law and Policy
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Human-Robot Interaction
- Incentives and Computation
- Infrastructure Studies
- Interface Design and Ubiquitous Computing
- Natural Language Processing
- Network Science
- Social Computing and Computer-supported Cooperative Work
- Technology and Equity
- People
- Career
- Undergraduate
- Info Sci Majors
- BA - Information Science (College of Arts & Sciences)
- BS - Information Science (CALS)
- BS - Information Science, Systems, and Technology
- Studying Abroad
- MPS Early Credit Option
- Independent Research
- CPT Procedures
- Student Associations
- Undergraduate Minor in Info Sci
- Our Students and Alumni
- Graduation Info
- Contact Us
- Info Sci Majors
- Masters
- PHD
- Prospective PhD Students
- Admissions
- Degree Requirements and Curriculum
- Grad Student Orgs
- For Current PhDs
- Diversity and Inclusion
- Our Students and Alumni
- Graduation Info
- Program Contacts and Student Advising
Info Sci PhD Samir Passi will lead the Graduate Seminar talk at 2:30 p.m. Friday, Feb. 10, in Gates 114. This talk is based on the paper Passi wrote with Prof. Steve Jackson. Light refreshments will be served.
Title: Data Vision - Learning to See Through Algorithmic Abstraction
Abstract: Learning to see through data is central to contemporary forms of algorithmic knowledge production. While often represented as a mechanical application of rules, making algorithms work with data requires a great deal of situated work. This paper examines how the often-divergent demands of mechanization and discretion manifest in data analytic learning environments. Drawing on research in CSCW and the social sciences, and ethnographic fieldwork in two data learning environments, we show how an algorithm's application is seen sometimes as a mechanical sequence of rules and at other times as an array of situated decisions. Casting data analytics as a rule-based (rather than rule-bound) practice, we show that effective data vision requires would-be analysts to straddle the competing demands of formal abstraction and empirical contingency. We conclude by discussing how the notion of data vision can help better leverage the role of human work in data analytic learning, research, and practice.