- About
- Message from the Chair
- History
- Facilities
- News
- Events
- Info Sci Colloquium
- Advancing Responsible AI with Human-Centered Evaluation
- Bowers Distinguished Speaker Series - Julie E. Cohen, Georgetown University Law Center
- From Agents to Optimization: User Interface Understanding and Generation
- The Language of Creation: How Generative AI Challenges Intuitions—and Offers New Possibilities
- IS Engaged
- Graduation Info
- Info Sci Colloquium
- Contact Us
- Courses
- Research
- Computational Social Science
- Critical Data Studies
- Data Science
- Economics and Information
- Education Technology
- Ethics, Law and Policy
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Human-Robot Interaction
- Incentives and Computation
- Infrastructure Studies
- Interface Design and Ubiquitous Computing
- Natural Language Processing
- Network Science
- Social Computing and Computer-supported Cooperative Work
- Technology and Equity
- People
- Career
- Undergraduate
- Info Sci Majors
- BA - Information Science (College of Arts & Sciences)
- BS - Information Science (CALS)
- BS - Information Science, Systems, and Technology
- Studying Abroad
- MPS Early Credit Option
- Independent Research
- CPT Procedures
- Student Associations
- Undergraduate Minor in Info Sci
- Our Students and Alumni
- Graduation Info
- Contact Us
- Info Sci Majors
- Masters
- PHD
- Prospective PhD Students
- Admissions
- Degree Requirements and Curriculum
- Grad Student Orgs
- For Current PhDs
- Diversity and Inclusion
- Our Students and Alumni
- Graduation Info
- Program Contacts and Student Advising
Research Associate in Communication Eric Baumer will be discussing some work-in-progress on the topic of: "On Computational Imaginary: Lay Beliefs about What Computing Systems Can Do and Should Do".
Various researchers have provided accounts -- technical, philosophical, or otherwise -- for what computers can, and implicitly cannot, do. However, relatively little work has explored this question empirically by examining contextualized lay beliefs about the capabilities of various computing systems systems. In this informal talk, I describe work-in-progress that develops the notion of the "computational imaginary." The talk is based on analysis of interview data wherein study participants describe their beliefs about what a system for analyzing political language might be able to do. I use these data to develop two dimensions of the computational imaginary: the descriptive dimension (i.e., what computers can do) and the normative dimension (i.e., what computers should). This two dimensional analytic framework may be of use in a variety of endeavors, from participatory design to future studies.
There will be snacks from Manndible.