Pre-print repositories have revolutionized the way researchers find out about latest developments in their fields. While traditional scholarly journals are still very much key mediums for disseminating discoveries, opponents argue the review process for publication is far too sluggish – taking anywhere from 85 to more than 150 days, according to Nature – while preprint servers like Cornell’s own, arXiv, have allowed for direct delivery of new research to entire scholarly communities.
With news of a major science-research publisher buying up a popular pre-print repository earlier this month, Info Sci’s Paul Ginsparg – who founded arXiv, cited as “the granddaddy of all preprint servers today” – was asked by Nature to weigh in on the likelihood of the Cornell-operated server being acquired by an outside entity. There are no such plans, he said.
“I always felt that it was an advantage that arXiv was not aligned with any particular publisher (or any academic ideology for that matter), making it more natural to ingest preprints that could simultaneously go to any publisher,” he tells Nature.
Funded with support from the Simons Foundation and several member institutions, arXiv provides open access to more than 1.1 million e-prints in the fields of physics and mathematics. In August, arXiv will turn 25.